Eldar Codex Break Down – HQ Sectio...
The Weekender XLBS: Thoughts On The Grum...
The Weekender: A Week Of Gaming & W...
Flames of War For The Win: Episode 4 ...
Convergence, Menoth, Mercs & Rhulic...
T 34/85, The KTS Kaplan Tac Troopers ...
A single source for members to keep the whole community informed of breaking stories and leaks.
The topics here feed to the homepage so please take care.
The good people over at Adeptus Miniatures have FINALLY given us some pictures to drool over. https://www.facebook.com/AdeptusMinatures
aaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhh! they’re so awesome!!!!! loving the tomb blades and wraiths!!!!
the price listing of all the releases can be found here http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2012/04/gw-news-may-releases-2012.html
So whats everyone’s thoughts? I think they all stayed true to the book art and as a result there’s no bad models in there! Well done GW. My favourite has to be the spyder or wraiths.
I don’t see what “Adeptus Miniatures” have to do with this. The pictures were leaked all over the place before this facebook page uploaded the pics.
I like the Matrix aesthetics GW have clearly “absorbed” though I prefer the original Wraiths.
Most of them look very good. The stalker and spyder are both very nice models and the new spider’s legs are more in line with the current range. I haven’t been in to 40k in a long time so I don’t know what makes these wraiths need tomb spyder faces, but they look cool anyway. The multiple torsos on the wraiths chest give off a strange human centipede (necron centipede?) vibe. Those whips are also the most breakable pieces I have seen in a long, long time. Those jetbikes though… I think they look ridiculous. The concept alone is a complete 180 from the 3ed destroyers and really kills some of the robot theme for me. Why would robots need non-transport vehicles; why not just make a sentient/ai vehicle like the spyders or destroyers? I think the old metal destroyers were a better design than these front-heavy flying chairs. At least the old ones were recliners.
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSugLLtjQMg6b2nd53hsdk0txB2SSXfeaiyx07RBJRLZUl_8NH84mJoF6nG4g < that's some of the concept art, I believe, for the Terminator Bikes in Terminator 4. GW obviously have ripped off these movies so there's no point hiding it, but at least the "bike terminators" if you will. were PART of the bike: which made more sense.
GW should have gone down along that road and absorbed that "part of the bike" theme.
is there a pic of szeras yet?
Treat people how you want to be treated, works wonders round here.
@dais the tomb blades arent relacements for detroyers, they are a new unit entirely. you can still get destroyers.
i think its a shame actually that vargard obyron is posed so statically.
@salty said: i think its a shame actually that vargard obyron is posed so statically.
I actually like it; he has that implacable look, which fits his bodyguard role.
thanks for the szeras pic, now i know mines better
@bloodhunter said: thanks for the szeras pic, now i know mines better
Is it possible to upload a photo so that we can all compare?
I bought a Destroyer lord and heavy destroy off eBay for 99p each (the seller did not spell warhammer correctly :p)
take that GW
Create an Account Click Here Why Create an Account on Beasts of War