Reply To: Is NewGW returning to old ways?

[onlyonepinman 18060xp 1]

I am reasonably certain that GW are not guilty of False Advertising, unless you can prove that the item listing and photographs on the page on which you actually purchased the item (so for example on the OTT store or GW webstore) changed AFTER you clicked order, then GW are not guilty of false advertising. They put some photographs up on a blog page that accompanied an announcement about an upcoming product. They later changed those photographs to match the contents of the box.

I can see how it’s annoying, I can see how it’s frustrating and I to an extent I even agree with you. But they are not definitely guilty of False Advertising.