Reply To: Historical and Modern Wargaming – Where the "Fluff" is Real Life

[oriskany 60771xp 1]

@wolfie65 – well, Napoleon was a great general, but a terrible historian.  He constantly quotes history in his writings and continuously misapplies the lessons learned within, on the strategic, operational, and tactical level.

Strategic:  “I know history.  Let me invade Russia!  Charles the XII had no idea what he was doing.
Operational:  “How do I handle an insurgency in Spain?  Put my brother in charge and hope for the best.”
Tactical:  “Look at how Wellington is deploying in front of a forest.  He’s no student of history.  Infantry can never pass through thinned woods like that.”

So the quote of his: “History is a set of lies agreed upon …”
Well, it’s not a lie (at least good history), and it’s never agreed upon.  🙂
So there’s another mark against you, Napoleon.

The reason we cite things like the mistakes in movies like Patton is precisely because they are not history (as you say in your post).  I also agree that the history printed in most “historical” wargaming is trash, which is why we don’t use it and set a higher standard for our content.