Exploring Scenarios In Sharp Practice – Part Three: The French & Indian War

November 28, 2017 by crew

Supported by (Turn Off)

Welcome to Part Three of our look at the different periods of Sharp Practice and the games we can play using the system. Today we're jumping in the time machine and heading to the Virginia backwoods in the year 1756. After General Braddock's defeat, the British army in North America needed time to recover and the settlers were left to their own devices.

Exploring Scenarios In Sharp Practice – Part Three: The French & Indian War

Read Part Two Here

French raiding party's descended on the frontier in an attempt to drive the settlers out who were defended by the struggling Virginian Provincials and local volunteers.

The History

The British blundered into a massacre at Monongahela which left the settlers and civilians defenceless to the French & Indian raids that followed. While the British rebuilt their army in North America, the defence of the frontier was left to men like Major George Washington, his Virginia Provincials and local volunteers who fought in small skirmishes and counter attacks.

While the British invaded Canada, the frontier still needed to be defended and it was a far less glorious post for an aspiring officer like Washington than accompanying Generals into "proper" combat.

Sharp Practice - Image #1

In this scenario the local area has been facing raids by a French raiding party encamped nearby and they're finally ready to act proactively. The next French target has been identified as a farmhouse, and the British have mustered as many volunteers as possible before setting out towards it.

This scenario will showcase the massive variety of colours and uniforms of the period and show that not all historical games are boring lines of the same guy over and over again.

Shuffling The Deck

The British force is attempting a rush to defend the farmhouse while the French force is trying to burn it to the ground and escape the field. The French deployed in the centre of one edge and the British opposite them with the Farmhouse in the centre.

Sharp Practice - Image #2

The British advance up the centre flanked by the settlers to their right and the Rangers to their left. The French concentrate their Regulars in the Centre and match the British settlers with their own settlers backed up by Indian Allies while they send Coureurs des Bois to engage the Rangers.

The Coureurs des Bois open fire on the Rangers while the Regulars and Indian allies go toe to toe with the British Regulars and Militia in a deadly firefight that occurs for several turns with no one side emerging as a winner. During this firefight, the Coureurs des Bois manage to light the farmhouse forcing the Rangers to abandon their fire support and barely keep the fire contained until they finally put it out.

The Rangers get into the flank of the French and now have to make a choice. Do they make a run for the French deployment point and deal a blow to French moral or do they give their allies support and try to turn the tide?

Give Them The Bayonet!

The French & Indians charge the British and manage to drive off the Militia but the Regulars manage to achieve a pyrrhic victory with only a handful of men left after routing the French and capturing their leader. The Settlers manage to drive one another from the field while the Indians get into a position to withdraw. The Rangers begin to fire on the French centre after the British defence there all but collapsed.

Sharp Practice French & Indian War Image #3

The British push back the Indian allies while the Rangers finally manage to kill a few Coureurs des Bois and send them into a route. The French are on the backfoot but the British aren't much better and both sides are low on Force Moral. Now here comes the big narrative decision, do the French put it all on the line to burn a farmhouse? Do they make one last push? Or, do they call it a day and retreat?

The Indians troops take stock of their situation, all their allies are gone, the British have two ragged units left. With a desire to preserve his men's lives the Sachem orders a retreat and concedes the day to the British. The British have driven off the French and saved the farm.


In this game, we see how trading fire isn't always the best option but maybe the safest. When the two sides stood off and traded fire the French and British took around the same casualties but during the melee, the French were essentially wiped out and the British weren't much better off.

Sharp Practice French & Indian War - Image #4

The French could have, instead of wasting a turn getting into position to fight the British, immediately set fire to the house and fought their way back keeping enough pressure on the British that they couldn't put out the fire which would have saved them a bloodbath in the melee but could have made it even harder to torch the house if the fire had been put out.

Sharp Practice makes players decide, do you complete your objective and run for your life while hoping the enemy doesn't kill you in the process or do you engage the enemy, get some breathing room and set the building on fire. The French decided to get into a stand-up fight with numerically superior troops even though the French and their Indian allies were better in combat.

Living To Fight Another Day

A voluntary retreat is also a feature of Sharp Practice that seeks to emulate reality and help the players tell the story. Do your last few ragged survivors make that valiant last stand or do they fight another day? In this situation, we decided it was a better story that the French retreated rather than fight to the last. This was after all just a raid and with no actual French troops left we felt it was unlikely that native allies would sacrifice themselves.

Sharp Practice French & Indian War - Image #5

While players can just play the rules and have a great game what really unlocks Sharp Practice's potential is when the players get into the story. Native allies burning down a farmhouse doesn't really call for a sacrifice but holding up a French advance to cover your retreating comrades does justify fighting to the last man

Melee is extremely deadly, rather than rolling to hit and having a one in six chance of killing the enemy you now just make a straight one in three roll to kill. The French, who were outnumbered roughly two to one, decided they would be better off shooting it out with the British rather than get involved in a melee where their small units would be in danger of being decimated. The British on the other hand had no incentive to send their lower quality and numerically superior troops into a melee they could easily lose.

Deciding How To Fire

Both sides decided to fire their men uncontrolled. This meant that firing only took two actions, fire and reload, instead of adding the third Present step. The players decided that rate and volume of fire mattered more than accuracy and the game of chicken was played throughout the whole firefight. If one side took the time to start presenting then their opponent would do the same and the relatively safe firefight would very quickly get a lot more intense.

While we normally see intense firefights as a good thing in this example the French and British were just trying to hold the centre while their flanks duelled it out. If the British player had routed the French earlier his flank would be open to an Indian counter charge while the Militia and Rangers made the French nervous about pushing until it was absolutely necessary.

The Settlers both broke and then the Rangers and Coureurs des Bois moved in to burn the house and made the centre more vital and one side needed to resolve it immediately before both forces were charged in the flanks and everyone was in trouble. One thing to always keep in mind is that you don't always want to be driving forward unsupported and if you do plan on a general assault you better be sure it'll succeed or your army can be cut to ribbons in the crossfire.

Sharp Practice French & Indian War - Image #6

The French could have replaced their settlers to give them more bodies and more muskets. The British on the other hand could have given up their flanking settlers to increase the regiment size of their line troops and better prepare themselves for the straight up fight they were looking for. List building in Sharp Practice does force you to make sacrifices with forces chosen from a set list and each player receiving a set number of points to buy extra troops, upgrade their existing troops or buy special add-ons like preachers, specialists and wagons to their force.

The British, having a lower points value, received enough points to buy some Rangers but not much else while the French had the freedom to take their pick and tailor their force towards what they needed for the game. They could have taken some more Regulars instead of the Indians or even more Indians instead of the Coureurs des Bois which would have drastically changed the way the game turned out.

Sharp Practice French & Indian War - Image #6

What do you guys think? Would you have raced for the objective and hoped to survive the enemy firepower, stand off and fight them or roll the dice and charge?

The next instalment is the one you've all been waiting for. We're headed to Spain where a Light Infantry detachment, accompanied by Riflemen have to hold out in a Spanish monastery while reinforcements arrive to get them out.

Post some comments below and let @Elessar2590 know what you thought.

If you would like to write an article for Beasts of War then please contact us at [email protected] for more information!

"The British force is attempting a rush to defend the farmhouse while the French force is trying to burn it to the ground and escape the field..."

Supported by (Turn Off)

"Do your last few ragged survivors make that valiant last stand or do they fight another day?"

Supported by (Turn Off)

Related Games

Related Companies