Skip to toolbar

10mm, Historical and Fantasy Questions.

Home Forums Historical Tabletop Game Discussions 10mm, Historical and Fantasy Questions.

Supported by (Turn Off)

Related Games:

Viewing 3 posts - 31 through 33 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1931848
    amachan
    25761xp

    There is a whole bit about frontages with other sized bases in Appendix 2 of the Warmaster Ancients rulebook.

    Using a Common Frontage
    Stands that normally face the 20mm frontage in
    Warmaster Ancients pose the most problems for existing
    armies that have been based for other game systems
    namely units of phalanx, chariots, elephants, and shock
    cavalry. Some players will doubtless have 5mm or 10mm
    armies that are incompatible with the narrow basing and
    we recognise that re-basing may not be practical or
    desirable.
    Rebasing will definitely pose a problem for players using
    15mm models, many of which are simply too large to fit
    onto the narrow edge in any case.
    To accommodate players who do not wish to use the
    narrow frontage, all ‘short’ 20mm frontages can be
    optionally mounted onto ‘long’ 40mm frontages as per
    standard infantry and cavalry.
    Stands switched from the 20mm to the 40mm front edge
    add +1 Attack modifier when charging and pursuing
    Note that this is the same as the standard rule for Shock
    cavalry mounted to the long edge (see Shock p127). Use
    whatever depth is required to fit the models. The tw«
    frontage types are not exactly equivalent but the effect is
    comparable.
    In some situations, the wider frontage and bonus confers
    an advantage compared to the narrow base, in other
    situation it is less effective, but overall it is an acceptable
    compromise that allows the two basing standards to be
    used on the same battlefield. You may find that in some
    instances, such as chariots, the wider base can
    accommodate two models slightly staggered. In other
    cases, such as Elephants, it may be desirable to fill out the
    base a little with supporting infantry or scenery. It is a
    good idea to deepen the base of the phalanx so that it
    looks more like a block of troops (eg, 40mmx40mm), This
    is simply a matter of taste — the number and arrangement
    of models makes no difference to the game itself.
    Note that it is perfectly acceptable to mix 40mm and
    20mm frontages together either in the same or opposing
    armies so long as the ‘shock’ bonus is applied to units on
    the broader frontage as described above.

    But why go through that hassle if you can avoid it in the first place?

    #1931850
    torros
    23839xp
    Cult of Games Member

    Ah OK.  It’s been a fair number of years since I looked either. I’d forgotten in was in the rulebook

    #1931934
    amachan
    25761xp

    Well, I just ordered a metric shit ton of miniatures….. Accidents happen I guess……

    I decided to do Midgard in 28mm. Due to my health I think just doing 28mm as that is what I am used to is the better way to go for now. I will keep these plans for 10mm for a later date. I thank you all for your input.

Viewing 3 posts - 31 through 33 (of 33 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Supported by (Turn Off)