Reply To: Warhammer Fantasy Battle….'returns'??

[caledor2 4273xp 2]

@phaidknott I think that CA choose warhammer old world because that fitted the best with the type of total war and there was already a lot of content for armies, art of cities and big amount of fluff. While AOS was still a skirmish type of game with not a lot of new content.

@limburger not everyone moved to the new editions. Since GW stopped WHFB and moved to the new 40K my brother and I didn’t move to the new editions. Several of the options I had in my army for 40k became obsolete. And I din’t want to start collecting a new army for AOS so we never got into it. Later I did check out the rules (because you could download them) but it didn’t interest me.

We did start playing historical games though and found the rules sets much better than what GW had to offer.

 

What I have noticed is that “newbs” don’t know much more than GW and think that they are the greatest best miniature gaming company in the world and that nobody can do better. Those that I know or hear from anyway.