Skip to toolbar

Team Yankee Boot Camp Live Blog: Saturday

Tale Of Four Gamers (US): Game One Catch-Up!

Supported by (Turn Off)

Tale Of Four Gamers (US): Game One Catch-Up!

24 Comments

Gianna catches up with our US players from the Team Yankee Boot Camp, buggeroff and redshane, to talk about their experiences with the game so far and those awesome American tanks...

Are you a US fan?

24
Leave a Reply

20 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
23 Comment authors
heregrimAnthony TrainernormandyfanPanzerKaputChristian Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
mo3355
Member
34xp

Terrain plays a big part thats sweet, and of course the dice rolls will always kill ya

dnr0d
Member
14xp

Dice always kill me — doesn’t matter who is rolling.

annaelizabeth
Member
74xp

So excited about this! Mom pre-ordered the ‘Team Yankee’ rulebook as part of my Christmas gift.

Expect to see MERDC camouflaged M1IPs hit the field by early January. XD

jocke
Cult of Games Member
4043xp

US sounds quite hard to play…

spaced2020
Member
2124xp

US forces need to be more tactical whereas the Ruskies can do the classic swarm tactic, at least so it appears based on this clip.

dnr0d
Member
14xp

Good. Sounds like it recreates the nigh-invincible reputation of the Soviets during the 1980s

blipvertus
Cult of Games Member
12359xp

How long is it taking to play these games?

britfran45
Member
3xp

when all the elments are added, should get real interesting

majorswotwot
Member
4xp

Glad to see they are balancing out in the end.

stonewall
Member
134xp

Have to agree, I think the Americans will be more tactically challenging, which to me is so much more interesting then a horde gameplay style.

sircaroon15
Member
284xp

Wait, the game will turn slightly in the US favour when you bring the other elements of the combat team.

fjhamming
Member
72xp

I always disliked how in warhammer terrain would either annoy both players because no unit could actually logically use it or just had random effect in the battle so that both players would just move around the terrain as much as possible. Since playing FoW that has massively changed. Good to see that they are still improving on the rules for terrain.

izeman82
Member
18xp

seems a nice balanced game, russians using the brute force/large numbers tactic versus the american technology! love it!

zorg
Cult of Games Member
18801xp

the dice GODS are a very fickle bunch that can be so cruel.

krieger
Member
6xp

Interesting with -bogging- being a primary concern. Playing FoW i always find terrain masking my vets being the biggest boon with terrain.

greaper
Member
1332xp

Get the laser charge your dice man!

weversberg
Member
4xp

Quality vs quantity. Ill take quality.

neaceul
Member
1xp

Will be interesting to hear from other players and what they say about the amount of terrain. As a USA player I would be open to more terrain than less 😉

oriskany
Cult of Games Member
60771xp

That is true, @neaceul . The M1s have higher movement rates and make easier bogging checks. So the denser the terrain (assuming its SHORT terrain), the bigger advantage to the Americans. TALL terrain, however, could screen a Soviet approach from the better and longer-ranged US firepower, and allow the Soviets to being superior numbers in a short killing distance where the advantage passes to them.

fireblarney
Cult of Games Member
6250xp

Terrain and Dice the great equalisers 🙂

panzerkaput
Cult of Games Member
33943xp

All Imperialists invaders of the Motherland must die

normandyfan
Member
910xp

GO USA

tonytt
Member
145xp

I like the fact that the two sides play different with different tactics. Looking forward to when the brits get involved. Challengers and Cheiftans for the win!!

heregrim
Cult of Games Member
62xp

Long range vs mass battle smell the burn!

Supported by (Turn Off)