Skip to toolbar
From the workbench of the esteemed Horati0nosebl0wer

From the workbench of the esteemed Horati0nosebl0wer

Supported by (Turn Off)

Will Androids Play With Silicone Meeples?

Tutoring 1
Skill 1
Idea 2
No Comments

Truth be told I find my brain wandering to the AI issue here in creative capture. The AI as we know it presently is a construct of weighted word association. The probability of words attaching to others created formula to follow. With that you move into the realm of images and begin attaching word to visual cues. The future “creativity” of AI models is based only on human association and has yet to show the true disturbing aspects of human imagination/association.

If you work from a thesaurus you can find synonyms and antonyms. Now, if you take color theory and apply it to factors of nuance in the subtle shade we apply to words there might be issue. Ex Machina would no longer be a simple story of the Murder Marrionette to be afraid of, one should fear the omnipresent cultural influence on a scale previously incapable by humanity. The written word and posted image (now curated video) nw make the real world move. The impact on material things here in the gaming sphere I believe are safe to a point. AI programs are machines. There is no need for play. There is no mechanical aspect of growth in performing research into the arena of play. The programming of information into a system has no tag of positive or negative through experience to a program. There is only binary input and output. AI can never have a “self” which is encoded between an id or superego. The human terminus of death is what gives us a place in sensing self, procreation and preservation.

On a base level code is merely present to act and has no other reason to be. Code executes and may continue to replicate until all resources are exhausted and all is one code. There is no uncertainty in binary being. The condition of “might be” doesn’t exist for all but the most advanced computers and has yet to make impact on physical reality. Creating to refinement perhaps is our best asset to ourselves as a species. Counter to our inherent genetic foibles our lifetime gives an “expiration” date that opens up resources for changes to occur. A static state computer system can never change and develop. “The Internet Is Forever” and why bloatware and system updates destroy your phone memory for processing.

To play is human, as we weigh on possibilities and impossible things. Imagination is our flexibility to suspend disbelief (lower the threshold of acceptable occurrence within a Boolean logic matrix). With spatial reality there is no connection to the computer world interpretation. There is yet to be a bridge to the gap between concrete physical to LLM association. The weird shit that will first come out once that happens is something that will shock us all.

 

Supported by (Turn Off)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Supported by (Turn Off)