Nice kit, should get one for my Paras. Arnhem is on my bucket list

Nice looking kit . I want to built one as a scenery piece , probably belly landed into a field with broken wings . Any room in the kit to add the pilot’s seats or is the cockpit too small ? I’ve only built one hdf / plastic kit , a LCVP kit from Corsec Eng . It has hdf floor , ramp and ribs and comes with thin laser cut plastic for the sides of the boat . I added extra details in plastic – more ribs , engine compartment , drivers station , gun tubs and guns etc , as well as a more to scale front ramp in plastic . As it comes its a nice game piece but , I made it more of a scale model . just for fun

What scale is this kit? From the size it looks something like 20mm? Maybe even 28mm? Does the box say anything?

Normandy is definately on my bucket list. Was around the area years ago, but not with my knowledge and interest now. Probably will be going next year.

To answer @dignity ‘s question at 1:46 –

The basic purpose of glider-borne infantry is to get airborne infantry all on the ground together at the same time and at the same place and with some slightly heavier equipment than can dropped via parachute. Paratroopers, as we see at D-Day, get scattered all over hell’s creation and they spend the first 12 hours of a battle trying to pull themselves together.

With a glider, everyone lands together. The squad or platoon is already together and ready to fight as a unit. Some gliders could even bring in light artillery like 37mm antitank guns, jeeps, etc.

Of course, this was before the advent of the combat helicopter. As soon as we get the ability to air-insert troops into combat by helicopter, that’s pretty much the end of the military glider (at least for airborne operations).

that is a fantastic looking kit guys.

I would like to see Thermopylae, Isandlwana, and Normandy.

A random historical note about the Horsa glider, it wasn’t necessarily a one way trip…

https://warisboring.com/the-snatch-method-was-one-crazy-way-to-make-a-glider-fly/

@oriskany made several good points. What’s interesting about glider operations is how each army took a very different view of them. The Germans used them at Eban-Emael in Belgium to land Falschrimjagers on the roof of the fort thinking it would be easier to defeat the fort without a prolonged battle. Turns out they were right. 78 Falschrimjagers assaulted the fort that had about 650 soliders. This fort was a big, built up, concreted reinforced series of guns, bunkers and all sorts of horrors designed to oppose a World War I style infantry assault. The Germans used shaped charges and to defeat the fortifications.

The Luftwaffe generally thought that glider troops should be used in the first wave to seize an airfield for follow on forces like the army’s air landing divisions (light infantry units trained to be flown in to a captured airfield) or to secure landing zones for the paratroopers as they generally got scattered all around and needed time to regroup to become combat effective. Much easier to do if your dropzone has already been secured.

The US army thought it was a cheap way to get more riflemen into a combat zone without having to bother with all that paratrooper training. They were basically standard rilflemen with a little bit of specialized training with the glider. The glider pilots tended to be guys who’d washed out of flight school and had very little training. Once on the ground, they no longer had a job and were left to fend for themselves.

The famous 101st US Airborne (Screaming Eagles) had two parachute regiemnts and 1 glider infantry regiment (327th GIR) and two of it’s four artillery battalions were glider artillery.

The British took a very different approach. They took existing infantry units and gave them rigorous assault training with an emphasis on rapid extraction from the glider and immediate assault upon landing. The glider pilots were given extensive training and practice and then once on the ground were organized into their own unit for ground operations.

@johnlyons and @dignity, visiting a battlefield you’ve read about is an interesting experience. I got to visit Iwo Jima and it’s an incredibly small island. Standing on top of Mt Suricbachi and being able to see the whole island gives you a real appreciation for the events that unfolded there. I’ll see if I can’t dig up some photos and post them in another topic.

Brill lads, lovely aircraft and it did its business to get the boys where they needed to be, not the safest craft but most of them made it.
Nice work John.

Battlefield Bucket List.

1. Waterloo. Commanded 4th Coy 2nd 95th Rifles at the bicentennial event 2015. One word, awesome.
2. Pegasus Bridge. Follow the battle from the gilders landing till relieved.
3. Retreat from Corunna. Took part in the bicentennial event 2009.
4. Bastogne. Walk the ground 101st held and the route Patton took to get there.
5. Ciudad Rodrigo. Completed this in 2012. Viewed the greater and lesser breaches, the hell those chaps went through. No wonder they sacked the town.
6. Somme 1916. I completed this during a Defence Ride, got to cover the main sailients from the British perspective. A truly humbling experience.
7. Badajoz. Completed this in 2012.
8. The journey of the TA Battalions forming The Queen’s Royal (West Surrey) Regiment, 131st British Brigade, 7th Armoured Division ww2. From the desert of North Africa, to the hills of Italy, to the plains of France and finally Berlin or bust. This was the war my grandfather fought. The plan is to follow his war diary, to finally understand the scafice they made in giving us the life we have. Having been in war myself, it will be interesting to understand the amount of ground they covered, as all the combat I have been a part of, has been static to one area and for 6-8 months stints. Grandad was away for 6 years. Made up for it when he got back, married his childhood sweetheart and had 10 children, life to the he ripe old age of 95.